Fox News Wants You to Believe That Trump-Bashing Killed the Emmys – It Didn’t

News Corpse Banner
The preliminary Nielsen scores for the 69th Primetime Emmy Awards broadcast are in they usually aren’t notably good. This system drew about eleven.2 million viewers, which is down barely from final yr’s present. However depart it to Fox Information to show this minor slippage right into a political disaster brought on by the relentless liberalism of Hollywood elites.

Fox Information on the Emmys

An op-ed on the Fox Information web site trumpeted the scores outcomes with a speculative headline asking “Emmys scores crater; Trump-bashing responsible?” The argument introduced by Fox’s Brian Flood was that criticism of Donald Trump sunk the printed to new lows. He writes that:

“It seems to be just like the 69th annual Emmy Awards are heading into sub-basement territory when it comes to scores after host Stephen Colbert spent a lot of Sunday’s occasion attacking President Trump. It seems American viewers might not have been as into Trump bashing as Hollywood would really like them to be.”

For the document, host Stephen Colbert didn’t spend a lot of the night time attacking Trump. In all he spent lower than three minutes out of a 3 hour program. However the actual absurdity of this evaluation is that it proposes one thing that’s unattainable. Fox Information thinks that viewers selected to not watch this system based mostly on their clairvoyant remark of the Trump-bashing earlier than it even started. Clearly, with out such ESP expertise they might not have recognized to not tune in.

RELATED: Stephen Colbert Simply Acquired Rewarded — BIGLY — for Standing As much as Trump

In truth, the Emmy broadcast has been scoring decrease numbers for a number of years. Trump wasn’t president when the scores started a falling development. The explanations educated individuals attribute to the decline are that tv doesn’t have the favored attraction of the Oscars and the Grammys. What’s extra, most of the profitable packages at the moment are airing on providers like Netflix and Hulu which have fewer viewers than broadcast TV. Consequently, the celebs are usually not as acquainted or compelling. And airing towards Sunday Night time Soccer didn’t assist both.

That didn’t cease Fox Information from establishing their biased perspective and interviewing political partisans to help it. Flood first sought the opinion of Dan Gainor of the extremely-conservative Media Analysis Middle. Predictably, Gainor slammed the occasion as “a Hollywood bubble present.” He additional castigated tv’s artistic group as out-of-contact with America and unqualified to precise an opinion. That’s a viewpoint that disappears from proper-wingers when the TV character is one in every of theirs. Working example: Donald Trump (or Ronald Reagan, Ted Nugent, Clint Eastwood, Scott Baio, and so forth.).

Donald Trump vs. Stephen Colbert

The argument that People may need tuned out the Emmys as a result of they objected to jokes about Trump additionally fails logically. The President is at present sitting on document low scores himself. And that’s from the American individuals, not a choose teams of present enterprise professionals. Together with his approval numbers wallowing…

Source link